Demographics details for Muscadine, AL vs Hattiesburg, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Muscadine, AL vs Hattiesburg, MS.

Data Muscadine Hattiesburg
Population 104 48,455
Median Age 38.0 years 28.5 years
Median Income $50,000 $41,024
Married Families 20.0% 23.0%
Poverty Level 12% 23%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Muscadine vs Hattiesburg

  • The population in Hattiesburg is higher at 48,455, compared to 104 in Muscadine.
  • Residents in Muscadine have a higher median age of 38.0 years compared to 28.5 years in Hattiesburg.
  • Muscadine has a higher median income of $50,000 compared to $41,024 in Hattiesburg.
  • In Hattiesburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 23.0%, compared to 20.0% in Muscadine.
  • The poverty level is higher in Hattiesburg at 23%, compared to 12% in Muscadine.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Muscadine and Hattiesburg at 3.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Muscadine vs Hattiesburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Muscadine Hattiesburg
Black 15 52
White 80 38
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 5 4
Two or More Races Data is updating 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Muscadine vs Hattiesburg

  • In Hattiesburg, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 52% compared to 15% in Muscadine.
  • Muscadine has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 38% in Hattiesburg.
  • In Hattiesburg, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Muscadine.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Muscadine at 5% compared to 4% in Hattiesburg.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hattiesburg at 5%, compared to 0% in Muscadine.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Muscadine and Hattiesburg at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Muscadine Hattiesburg
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 17.3%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 13.3%
Depression Data is updating% 20.7%
Smoking Data is updating% 20.8%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 12.9%
Obesity Data is updating% 43.0%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Muscadine vs Hattiesburg

  • In Hattiesburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 0.0% in Muscadine.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Hattiesburg at 20.7% versus 0.0% in Muscadine.
  • Hattiesburg has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 0.0% in Muscadine.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Hattiesburg at 12.9% compared to 0.0% in Muscadine.
  • Hattiesburg has higher obesity rates at 43.0% compared to 0.0% in Muscadine.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hattiesburg at 19.0% compared to 0.0% in Muscadine.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Muscadine Hattiesburg
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.7% (362)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 10.4% (5,022)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 7.5% (3,642)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 20.2% (9,782)

Education Levels Comparison: Muscadine vs Hattiesburg

  • In Hattiesburg, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Muscadine.
  • In Hattiesburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.4% compared to 0.0% in Muscadine.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hattiesburg at 7.5%, compared to 0.0% in Muscadine.
  • In Hattiesburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.2% compared to 0.0% in Muscadine.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.