Environment details: Muscadine AL
good quality; appropriate for most needs.
Environment details: Hattiesburg MS
water quality is acceptable; few contaminants found.
Compare Environment: Muscadine AL vs Hattiesburg MS
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Muscadine | Hattiesburg |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 867 | 504 |
| Water Quality | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | good quality; appropriate for most needs. | water quality is acceptable; few contaminants found. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.62 | 1.54 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 29 | 21 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Muscadine vs Hattiesburg
- Water quality is rated higher in Muscadine at 7/10 compared to 6/10 in Hattiesburg.
- The median air quality index is lower (worse) in Muscadine at 2.0 compared to 1.0 in Hattiesburg.
- The average air quality index is worse in Muscadine with 1.62 compared to 1.54 in Hattiesburg.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Muscadine at 29 compared to 21 in Hattiesburg.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.