Demographics details for Mullica hill, NJ vs Fairfield, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mullica hill, NJ vs Fairfield, CA.
| Data | Mullica hill | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,454 | 119,338 |
| Median Age | 41.0 years | 35.8 years |
| Median Income | $123,265 | $98,857 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Mullica hill vs Fairfield
- The population in Fairfield is higher at 119,338, compared to 4,454 in Mullica hill.
- Residents in Mullica hill have a higher median age of 41.0 years compared to 35.8 years in Fairfield.
- Mullica hill has a higher median income of $123,265 compared to $98,857 in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mullica hill at 46.0% compared to 39.0% in Fairfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairfield at 12%, compared to 4% in Mullica hill.
- Fairfield has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.2% in Mullica hill.
Demographics
Demographics Mullica hill vs Fairfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mullica hill | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 15 |
| White | 74 | 23 |
| Asian | 4 | 18 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mullica hill vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 11% in Mullica hill.
- Mullica hill has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 23% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 4% in Mullica hill.
- Fairfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 4% in Mullica hill.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fairfield at 14%, compared to 7% in Mullica hill.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mullica hill and Fairfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mullica hill | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.7% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.9% | 10.7% |
| Depression | 20.9% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 10.3% | 11.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 16.1% |
| Obesity | 27.7% | 30.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mullica hill vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 13.7% in Mullica hill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mullica hill at 20.9% compared to 17.7% in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher smoking rate at 11.9% compared to 10.3% in Mullica hill.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mullica hill at 20.0% compared to 16.1% in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has higher obesity rates at 30.1% compared to 27.7% in Mullica hill.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Mullica hill and Fairfield at 12.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mullica hill | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (33) | 2.1% (2,515) |
| High School Diploma | 12.9% (576) | 13.7% (16,358) |
| Less than High School | 5.5% (244) | 14.6% (17,464) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.2% (1,612) | 18.3% (21,856) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mullica hill vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.7% in Mullica hill.
- In Fairfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.7% compared to 12.9% in Mullica hill.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fairfield at 14.6%, compared to 5.5% in Mullica hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mullica hill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.2% compared to 18.3% in Fairfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.