Environment details: Mullica hill NJ
Water quality moderate; pollution influences noted.
Environment details: Fairfield CA
Average quality; may require filtration.
Compare Environment: Mullica hill NJ vs Fairfield CA
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Mullica hill | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 713 | 2592 |
| Water Quality | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Water quality moderate; pollution influences noted. | Average quality; may require filtration. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.87 | 1.9 |
| Worst AQI | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 62 | 70 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Mullica hill vs Fairfield
- Both cities report the same water quality at 5/10.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Fairfield with an average index of 1.9 compared to 1.87 in Mullica hill.
- Fairfield experiences more days with poor air quality at 70 compared to 62 in Mullica hill.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.