Demographics details for Mankato, MN vs South gate, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mankato, MN vs South gate, CA.

Data Mankato South gate
Population 45,140 90,926
Median Age 26.5 years 33.7 years
Median Income $61,726 $67,188
Married Families 28.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 10% 18%
Unemployment Rate 3.4 6.1

Population Comparison: Mankato vs South gate

  • The population in South gate is higher at 90,926, compared to 45,140 in Mankato.
  • The median age in South gate is higher at 33.7 years, compared to 26.5 years in Mankato.
  • South gate has a higher median income of $67,188, compared to $61,726 in Mankato.
  • In South gate, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 28.0% in Mankato.
  • The poverty level is higher in South gate at 18%, compared to 10% in Mankato.
  • South gate has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 3.4% in Mankato.

Demographics

Demographics Mankato vs South gate provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mankato South gate
Black 7 1
White 81 -21
Asian 4 1
Hispanic 5 97
Two or More Races 3 21
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Mankato vs South gate

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mankato at 7% compared to 1% in South gate.
  • Mankato has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to -21% in South gate.
  • The Asian population is larger in Mankato at 4% compared to 1% in South gate.
  • South gate has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 97%, compared to 5% in Mankato.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South gate at 21%, compared to 3% in Mankato.
  • In South gate, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Mankato.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mankato South gate
Mental Health Not Good 16.0% 16.8%
Physical Health Not Good 10.1% 14.9%
Depression 25.0% 16.3%
Smoking 18.4% 12.7%
Binge Drinking 19.9% 14.5%
Obesity 37.2% 34.1%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mankato vs South gate

  • In South gate, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 16.0% in Mankato.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Mankato at 25.0% compared to 16.3% in South gate.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Mankato at 18.4% compared to 12.7% in South gate.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Mankato at 19.9% compared to 14.5% in South gate.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Mankato at 37.2% compared to 34.1% in South gate.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Mankato at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in South gate.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mankato South gate
No Schooling 0.8% (349) 4.6% (4,160)
High School Diploma 9.3% (4,187) 14.9% (13,536)
Less than High School 5.7% (2,556) 53.3% (48,481)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.6% (8,847) 7.5% (6,822)

Education Levels Comparison: Mankato vs South gate

  • In South gate, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.6% compared to 0.8% in Mankato.
  • In South gate, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.9% compared to 9.3% in Mankato.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South gate at 53.3%, compared to 5.7% in Mankato.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mankato hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 7.5% in South gate.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.