Demographics details for Lincoln, NE vs South san francisco, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lincoln, NE vs South san francisco, CA.
Data | Lincoln | South san francisco |
---|---|---|
Population | 292,627 | 63,484 |
Median Age | 33.1 years | 42.3 years |
Median Income | $67,846 | $127,062 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Lincoln vs South san francisco
- In Lincoln, the population is higher at 292,627, compared to 63,484 in South san francisco.
- The median age in South san francisco is higher at 42.3 years, compared to 33.1 years in Lincoln.
- South san francisco has a higher median income of $127,062, compared to $67,846 in Lincoln.
- In South san francisco, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 37.0% in Lincoln.
- Lincoln has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in South san francisco.
- South san francisco has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.0% in Lincoln.
Demographics
Demographics Lincoln vs South san francisco provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lincoln | South san francisco |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 2 |
White | 76 | 11 |
Asian | 4 | 45 |
Hispanic | 8 | 30 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 11 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Lincoln vs South san francisco
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lincoln at 4% compared to 2% in South san francisco.
- Lincoln has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 11% in South san francisco.
- In South san francisco, the Asian population stands at 45%, greater than 4% in Lincoln.
- South san francisco has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 8% in Lincoln.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South san francisco at 11%, compared to 7% in Lincoln.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lincoln and South san francisco at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lincoln | South san francisco |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.1% | 12.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.6% | 8.8% |
Depression | 19.3% | 13.7% |
Smoking | 14.7% | 9.3% |
Binge Drinking | 21.7% | 14.5% |
Obesity | 34.4% | 21.9% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lincoln vs South san francisco
- More residents in Lincoln report poor mental health at 14.1% compared to 12.9% in South san francisco.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lincoln at 19.3% compared to 13.7% in South san francisco.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lincoln at 14.7% compared to 9.3% in South san francisco.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lincoln at 21.7% compared to 14.5% in South san francisco.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lincoln at 34.4% compared to 21.9% in South san francisco.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Lincoln and South san francisco at 10.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lincoln | South san francisco |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (3,779) | 2.5% (1,583) |
High School Diploma | 10.3% (30,238) | 13.7% (8,667) |
Less than High School | 7.6% (22,267) | 14.8% (9,368) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.1% (73,443) | 30.4% (19,273) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lincoln vs South san francisco
- In South san francisco, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 1.3% in Lincoln.
- In South san francisco, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.7% compared to 10.3% in Lincoln.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South san francisco at 14.8%, compared to 7.6% in Lincoln.
- In South san francisco, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.4% compared to 25.1% in Lincoln.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.