Demographics details for Lansing, MI vs Port charlotte, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lansing, MI vs Port charlotte, FL.
Data | Lansing | Port charlotte |
---|---|---|
Population | 112,537 | 63,913 |
Median Age | 32.9 years | 55.6 years |
Median Income | $50,747 | $58,799 |
Married Families | 28.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 19% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 7.4 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Lansing vs Port charlotte
- In Lansing, the population is higher at 112,537, compared to 63,913 in Port charlotte.
- The median age in Port charlotte is higher at 55.6 years, compared to 32.9 years in Lansing.
- Port charlotte has a higher median income of $58,799, compared to $50,747 in Lansing.
- In Port charlotte, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 28.0% in Lansing.
- Lansing has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 11% in Port charlotte.
- The unemployment rate in Lansing is higher at 7.4%, compared to 4.2% in Port charlotte.
Demographics
Demographics Lansing vs Port charlotte provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lansing | Port charlotte |
---|---|---|
Black | 24 | 7 |
White | 48 | 71 |
Asian | 5 | 2 |
Hispanic | 13 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lansing vs Port charlotte
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lansing at 24% compared to 7% in Port charlotte.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Port charlotte at 71% compared to 48% in Lansing.
- The Asian population is larger in Lansing at 5% compared to 2% in Port charlotte.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lansing at 13% compared to 12% in Port charlotte.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lansing at 10% compared to 8% in Port charlotte.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lansing and Port charlotte at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lansing | Port charlotte |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 17.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.9% | 11.9% |
Depression | 26.3% | 20.7% |
Smoking | 19.6% | 22.0% |
Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 16.6% |
Obesity | 40.7% | 31.0% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lansing vs Port charlotte
- More residents in Lansing report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 17.2% in Port charlotte.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lansing at 26.3% compared to 20.7% in Port charlotte.
- Port charlotte has a higher smoking rate at 22.0% compared to 19.6% in Lansing.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Port charlotte at 16.6% compared to 16.0% in Lansing.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lansing at 40.7% compared to 31.0% in Port charlotte.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Port charlotte at 23.0% compared to 17.0% in Lansing.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lansing | Port charlotte |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (1,419) | 1.4% (901) |
High School Diploma | 13.5% (15,216) | 24.2% (15,437) |
Less than High School | 10.0% (11,269) | 14.7% (9,408) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (21,667) | 16.0% (10,215) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lansing vs Port charlotte
- In Port charlotte, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.3% in Lansing.
- In Port charlotte, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.2% compared to 13.5% in Lansing.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Port charlotte at 14.7%, compared to 10.0% in Lansing.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lansing hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 16.0% in Port charlotte.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.