Demographics details for Lansing, IA vs Jim falls, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lansing, IA vs Jim falls, WI.
Data | Lansing | Jim falls |
---|---|---|
Population | 951 | 219 |
Median Age | 49.5 years | 40.6 years |
Median Income | $47,730 | $87,143 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 53.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Lansing vs Jim falls
- In Lansing, the population is higher at 951, compared to 219 in Jim falls.
- Residents in Lansing have a higher median age of 49.5 years compared to 40.6 years in Jim falls.
- Jim falls has a higher median income of $87,143, compared to $47,730 in Lansing.
- In Jim falls, the percentage of married families is higher at 53.0%, compared to 42.0% in Lansing.
- The poverty level is higher in Jim falls at 5%, compared to 0% in Lansing.
- Jim falls has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 2.5% in Lansing.
Demographics
Demographics Lansing vs Jim falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lansing | Jim falls |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | Data is updating |
White | 96 | 100 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 1 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 1 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lansing vs Jim falls
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lansing at 2% compared to 0% in Jim falls.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Jim falls at 100% compared to 96% in Lansing.
- Both Lansing and Jim falls have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lansing at 1% compared to 0% in Jim falls.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lansing at 1% compared to 0% in Jim falls.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lansing and Jim falls at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lansing | Jim falls |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 15.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 10.2% |
Depression | 18.3% | 24.5% |
Smoking | 17.0% | 17.2% |
Binge Drinking | 22.2% | 25.0% |
Obesity | 35.0% | 34.0% |
Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lansing vs Jim falls
- In Jim falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 15.2% in Lansing.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Jim falls at 24.5% versus 18.3% in Lansing.
- Jim falls has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 17.0% in Lansing.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Jim falls at 25.0% compared to 22.2% in Lansing.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lansing at 35.0% compared to 34.0% in Jim falls.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lansing at 23.0% compared to 15.0% in Jim falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lansing | Jim falls |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 36.3% (345) | 14.2% (31) |
Less than High School | 6.9% (66) | 13.7% (30) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.2% (126) | 21.5% (47) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lansing vs Jim falls
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Lansing and Jim falls at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lansing hold a high school diploma at 36.3% compared to 14.2% in Jim falls.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Jim falls at 13.7%, compared to 6.9% in Lansing.
- In Jim falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.5% compared to 13.2% in Lansing.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.