Environment details: Lansing IA
Good quality; reliable for usage.
Environment details: Jim falls WI
Poor; serious contamination observed.
Compare Environment: Lansing IA vs Jim falls WI
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Lansing | Jim falls |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 585 | 740 |
| Water Quality | 6/10 | 3/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Good quality; reliable for usage. | Poor; serious contamination observed. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.65 | 1.59 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 21 | 17 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Lansing vs Jim falls
- Water quality is rated higher in Lansing at 6/10 compared to 3/10 in Jim falls.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- The average air quality index is worse in Lansing with 1.65 compared to 1.59 in Jim falls.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Lansing at 21 compared to 17 in Jim falls.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.