Demographics details for Lancaster, CA vs Newton, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, CA vs Newton, MA.
| Data | Lancaster | Newton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 169,185 | 87,381 |
| Median Age | 33.6 years | 41.7 years |
| Median Income | $71,367 | $176,373 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 8.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Lancaster vs Newton
- In Lancaster, the population is higher at 169,185, compared to 87,381 in Newton.
- The median age in Newton is higher at 41.7 years, compared to 33.6 years in Lancaster.
- Newton has a higher median income of $176,373, compared to $71,367 in Lancaster.
- In Newton, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 32.0% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 5% in Newton.
- The unemployment rate in Lancaster is higher at 8.2%, compared to 3.5% in Newton.
Demographics
Demographics Lancaster vs Newton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lancaster | Newton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 21 | 3 |
| White | 10 | 73 |
| Asian | 4 | 14 |
| Hispanic | 46 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs Newton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lancaster at 21% compared to 3% in Newton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Newton at 73% compared to 10% in Lancaster.
- In Newton, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 4% in Lancaster.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lancaster at 46% compared to 4% in Newton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lancaster at 18% compared to 6% in Newton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Lancaster at 1% compared to 0% in Newton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lancaster | Newton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 12.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 6.9% |
| Depression | 17.7% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | 7.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 32.9% | 21.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs Newton
- More residents in Lancaster report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 12.4% in Newton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Newton at 19.7% versus 17.7% in Lancaster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lancaster at 14.8% compared to 7.3% in Newton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Newton at 19.1% compared to 15.1% in Lancaster.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lancaster at 32.9% compared to 21.7% in Newton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lancaster at 10.0% compared to 8.0% in Newton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lancaster | Newton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (3,403) | 0.5% (413) |
| High School Diploma | 17.5% (29,555) | 4.5% (3,941) |
| Less than High School | 21.5% (36,421) | 2.9% (2,554) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.3% (20,861) | 54.7% (47,769) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs Newton
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.5% in Newton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a high school diploma at 17.5% compared to 4.5% in Newton.
- More residents in Lancaster have less than a high school education at 21.5% compared to 2.9% in Newton.
- In Newton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 54.7% compared to 12.3% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.