Demographics details for Kosciusko, MS vs Staunton, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kosciusko, MS vs Staunton, VA.
| Data | Kosciusko | Staunton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,922 | 25,904 |
| Median Age | 36.2 years | 41.0 years |
| Median Income | $33,719 | $59,731 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.5 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Kosciusko vs Staunton
- The population in Staunton is higher at 25,904, compared to 6,922 in Kosciusko.
- The median age in Staunton is higher at 41.0 years, compared to 36.2 years in Kosciusko.
- Staunton has a higher median income of $59,731, compared to $33,719 in Kosciusko.
- In Staunton, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 25.0% in Kosciusko.
- Kosciusko has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 10% in Staunton.
- The unemployment rate in Kosciusko is higher at 6.5%, compared to 3.0% in Staunton.
Demographics
Demographics Kosciusko vs Staunton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kosciusko | Staunton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 53 | 11 |
| White | 42 | 79 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kosciusko vs Staunton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kosciusko at 53% compared to 11% in Staunton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Staunton at 79% compared to 42% in Kosciusko.
- In Staunton, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Kosciusko.
- Staunton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 2% in Kosciusko.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Staunton at 5%, compared to 3% in Kosciusko.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kosciusko and Staunton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kosciusko | Staunton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.2% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 26.1% | 16.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.3% | 17.5% |
| Obesity | 46.0% | 35.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kosciusko vs Staunton
- More residents in Kosciusko report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 16.8% in Staunton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Staunton at 24.3% versus 22.8% in Kosciusko.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Kosciusko at 26.1% compared to 16.3% in Staunton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Staunton at 17.5% compared to 11.3% in Kosciusko.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kosciusko at 46.0% compared to 35.2% in Staunton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kosciusko at 18.0% compared to 15.0% in Staunton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kosciusko | Staunton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (39) | 0.6% (163) |
| High School Diploma | 18.4% (1,276) | 17.4% (4,506) |
| Less than High School | 9.0% (624) | 9.5% (2,465) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (886) | 23.8% (6,161) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kosciusko vs Staunton
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Kosciusko and Staunton at 0.6%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kosciusko hold a high school diploma at 18.4% compared to 17.4% in Staunton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Staunton at 9.5%, compared to 9.0% in Kosciusko.
- In Staunton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 12.8% in Kosciusko.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.