Environment details: Kosciusko MS
Good quality, overall safe for consumption.
Environment details: Staunton VA
Poor quality, requires significant treatment.
Compare Environment: Kosciusko MS vs Staunton VA
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Kosciusko | Staunton |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 504 | 784 |
| Water Quality | 7/10 | 3/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Good quality, overall safe for consumption. | Poor quality, requires significant treatment. |
| Median Air Quality | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.55 | 1.61 |
| Worst AQI | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 20 | 29 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Kosciusko vs Staunton
- Water quality is rated higher in Kosciusko at 7/10 compared to 3/10 in Staunton.
- Staunton has a better median air quality index at 2.0 compared to 1.0 in Kosciusko.
- Air quality is better in Staunton with an average index of 1.61 compared to 1.55 in Kosciusko.
- Staunton experiences more days with poor air quality at 29 compared to 20 in Kosciusko.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.