Demographics details for Knoxville, TN vs Jurupa valley, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Knoxville, TN vs Jurupa valley, CA.

Data Knoxville Jurupa valley
Population 195,889 107,609
Median Age 33.4 years 33.5 years
Median Income $48,309 $91,562
Married Families 28.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 15% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.9

Population Comparison: Knoxville vs Jurupa valley

  • In Knoxville, the population is higher at 195,889, compared to 107,609 in Jurupa valley.
  • The median age in Jurupa valley is higher at 33.5 years, compared to 33.4 years in Knoxville.
  • Jurupa valley has a higher median income of $91,562, compared to $48,309 in Knoxville.
  • In Jurupa valley, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 28.0% in Knoxville.
  • Knoxville has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Jurupa valley.
  • Jurupa valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.5% in Knoxville.

Demographics

Demographics Knoxville vs Jurupa valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Knoxville Jurupa valley
Black 16 3
White 70 8
Asian 2 4
Hispanic 6 71
Two or More Races 6 13
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Knoxville vs Jurupa valley

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Knoxville at 16% compared to 3% in Jurupa valley.
  • Knoxville has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 8% in Jurupa valley.
  • In Jurupa valley, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Knoxville.
  • Jurupa valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 71%, compared to 6% in Knoxville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Jurupa valley at 13%, compared to 6% in Knoxville.
  • In Jurupa valley, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Knoxville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Knoxville Jurupa valley
Mental Health Not Good 20.0% 16.7%
Physical Health Not Good 13.6% 13.3%
Depression 28.4% 17.4%
Smoking 21.3% 14.6%
Binge Drinking 15.0% 16.1%
Obesity 40.0% 38.4%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Knoxville vs Jurupa valley

  • More residents in Knoxville report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 16.7% in Jurupa valley.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Knoxville at 28.4% compared to 17.4% in Jurupa valley.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Knoxville at 21.3% compared to 14.6% in Jurupa valley.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Jurupa valley at 16.1% compared to 15.0% in Knoxville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Knoxville at 40.0% compared to 38.4% in Jurupa valley.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Knoxville at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Jurupa valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Knoxville Jurupa valley
No Schooling 0.6% (1,214) 3.1% (3,376)
High School Diploma 14.4% (28,287) 17.3% (18,582)
Less than High School 10.9% (21,344) 34.3% (36,892)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 20.7% (40,598) 9.0% (9,706)

Education Levels Comparison: Knoxville vs Jurupa valley

  • In Jurupa valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.6% in Knoxville.
  • In Jurupa valley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.3% compared to 14.4% in Knoxville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Jurupa valley at 34.3%, compared to 10.9% in Knoxville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Knoxville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.7% compared to 9.0% in Jurupa valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.