Demographics details for Klamath falls, OR vs New haven, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Klamath falls, OR vs New haven, MO.
Data | Klamath falls | New haven |
---|---|---|
Population | 21,977 | 2,409 |
Median Age | 35.1 years | 31.2 years |
Median Income | $46,695 | $66,410 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 60.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Klamath falls vs New haven
- In Klamath falls, the population is higher at 21,977, compared to 2,409 in New haven.
- Residents in Klamath falls have a higher median age of 35.1 years compared to 31.2 years in New haven.
- New haven has a higher median income of $66,410, compared to $46,695 in Klamath falls.
- In New haven, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 31.0% in Klamath falls.
- Klamath falls has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 10% in New haven.
- The unemployment rate in Klamath falls is higher at 5.2%, compared to 2.5% in New haven.
Demographics
Demographics Klamath falls vs New haven provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Klamath falls | New haven |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 1 |
White | 69 | 76 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 15 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 11 |
American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Klamath falls vs New haven
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Klamath falls and New haven at 1%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in New haven at 76% compared to 69% in Klamath falls.
- The Asian population is larger in Klamath falls at 1% compared to 0% in New haven.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Klamath falls at 15% compared to 12% in New haven.
- Both Klamath falls and New haven have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 11%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Klamath falls at 3% compared to 0% in New haven.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Klamath falls | New haven |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 16.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 10.8% |
Depression | 28.4% | 24.7% |
Smoking | 19.9% | 18.0% |
Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 20.0% |
Obesity | 35.9% | 36.6% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Klamath falls vs New haven
- More residents in Klamath falls report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 16.7% in New haven.
- Depression is more prevalent in Klamath falls at 28.4% compared to 24.7% in New haven.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Klamath falls at 19.9% compared to 18.0% in New haven.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in New haven at 20.0% compared to 15.8% in Klamath falls.
- New haven has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 35.9% in Klamath falls.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in New haven at 24.0% compared to 20.0% in Klamath falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Klamath falls | New haven |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (192) | 0.2% (5) |
High School Diploma | 16.0% (3,508) | 19.7% (475) |
Less than High School | 15.5% (3,401) | 12.2% (293) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (3,175) | 24.8% (598) |
Education Levels Comparison: Klamath falls vs New haven
- A higher percentage of residents in Klamath falls have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.2% in New haven.
- In New haven, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.7% compared to 16.0% in Klamath falls.
- More residents in Klamath falls have less than a high school education at 15.5% compared to 12.2% in New haven.
- In New haven, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.8% compared to 14.4% in Klamath falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.