Demographics details for Kingston, TN vs Spanish fork, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kingston, TN vs Spanish fork, UT.
Data | Kingston | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
Population | 6,115 | 44,102 |
Median Age | 44.7 years | 27.4 years |
Median Income | $67,637 | $93,989 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Kingston vs Spanish fork
- The population in Spanish fork is higher at 44,102, compared to 6,115 in Kingston.
- Residents in Kingston have a higher median age of 44.7 years compared to 27.4 years in Spanish fork.
- Spanish fork has a higher median income of $93,989, compared to $67,637 in Kingston.
- In Spanish fork, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 37.0% in Kingston.
- Kingston has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 6% in Spanish fork.
- Spanish fork has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.4% in Kingston.
Demographics
Demographics Kingston vs Spanish fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Kingston | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 1 |
White | 91 | 80 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kingston vs Spanish fork
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kingston at 4% compared to 1% in Spanish fork.
- Kingston has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 80% in Spanish fork.
- Both Kingston and Spanish fork have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Spanish fork has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 2% in Kingston.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Spanish fork at 7%, compared to 3% in Kingston.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kingston and Spanish fork at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Kingston | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 15.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 10.8% |
Depression | 26.6% | 23.8% |
Smoking | 18.0% | 7.7% |
Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 8.3% |
Obesity | 34.5% | 31.0% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kingston vs Spanish fork
- More residents in Kingston report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 15.0% in Spanish fork.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kingston at 26.6% compared to 23.8% in Spanish fork.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Kingston at 18.0% compared to 7.7% in Spanish fork.
- Binge drinking is more common in Kingston at 16.9% compared to 8.3% in Spanish fork.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kingston at 34.5% compared to 31.0% in Spanish fork.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kingston at 20.0% compared to 8.0% in Spanish fork.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Kingston | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (25) | 0.4% (175) |
High School Diploma | 23.4% (1,433) | 9.1% (4,010) |
Less than High School | 10.0% (613) | 5.9% (2,583) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.5% (1,009) | 19.4% (8,546) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kingston vs Spanish fork
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Kingston and Spanish fork at 0.4%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kingston hold a high school diploma at 23.4% compared to 9.1% in Spanish fork.
- More residents in Kingston have less than a high school education at 10.0% compared to 5.9% in Spanish fork.
- In Spanish fork, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 16.5% in Kingston.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.