Environment details: Kingston TN
acceptable; some quality issues remain.
Environment details: Spanish fork UT
water quality is good with minimal industrial impact.
Compare Environment: Kingston TN vs Spanish fork UT
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Kingston | Spanish fork |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 741 | 496 |
| Water Quality | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | acceptable; some quality issues remain. | water quality is good with minimal industrial impact. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| Worst AQI | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 30 | 65 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Kingston vs Spanish fork
- The water quality in Spanish fork is superior at 7/10 compared to 6/10 in Kingston.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Spanish fork with an average index of 1.8 compared to 1.6 in Kingston.
- Spanish fork experiences more days with poor air quality at 65 compared to 30 in Kingston.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.