Demographics details for Kingsport, TN vs Charleston, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kingsport, TN vs Charleston, IL.
| Data | Kingsport | Charleston |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 56,150 | 17,119 |
| Median Age | 44.6 years | 29.4 years |
| Median Income | $48,228 | $47,533 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Kingsport vs Charleston
- In Kingsport, the population is higher at 56,150, compared to 17,119 in Charleston.
- Residents in Kingsport have a higher median age of 44.6 years compared to 29.4 years in Charleston.
- Kingsport has a higher median income of $48,228 compared to $47,533 in Charleston.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Kingsport at 38.0% compared to 32.0% in Charleston.
- The poverty level is higher in Charleston at 15%, compared to 13% in Kingsport.
- Charleston has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 4.2% in Kingsport.
Demographics
Demographics Kingsport vs Charleston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kingsport | Charleston |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 8 |
| White | 89 | 83 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kingsport vs Charleston
- In Charleston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 3% in Kingsport.
- Kingsport has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 83% in Charleston.
- In Charleston, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Kingsport.
- Charleston has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 3% in Kingsport.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Kingsport at 4% compared to 3% in Charleston.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kingsport and Charleston at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kingsport | Charleston |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 30.7% | 24.2% |
| Smoking | 22.2% | 20.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 37.0% | 36.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kingsport vs Charleston
- More residents in Kingsport report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 17.9% in Charleston.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kingsport at 30.7% compared to 24.2% in Charleston.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Kingsport at 22.2% compared to 20.0% in Charleston.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Charleston at 16.4% compared to 13.8% in Kingsport.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kingsport at 37.0% compared to 36.5% in Charleston.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kingsport at 21.0% compared to 18.0% in Charleston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kingsport | Charleston |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (359) | 0.4% (68) |
| High School Diploma | 18.7% (10,481) | 13.6% (2,331) |
| Less than High School | 14.2% (7,995) | 8.1% (1,387) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.6% (12,103) | 19.3% (3,307) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kingsport vs Charleston
- A higher percentage of residents in Kingsport have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Charleston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kingsport hold a high school diploma at 18.7% compared to 13.6% in Charleston.
- More residents in Kingsport have less than a high school education at 14.2% compared to 8.1% in Charleston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kingsport hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.6% compared to 19.3% in Charleston.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.