Environment details: Kingsport TN
decent quality; seasonal testing needed.
Environment details: Charleston IL
Poor quality due to agricultural runoff.
Compare Environment: Kingsport TN vs Charleston IL
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Kingsport | Charleston |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 741 | 1474 |
| Water Quality | 6/10 | 4/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | decent quality; seasonal testing needed. | Poor quality due to agricultural runoff. |
| Median Air Quality | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.56 | 1.72 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 25 | 33 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Kingsport vs Charleston
- Water quality is rated higher in Kingsport at 6/10 compared to 4/10 in Charleston.
- Charleston has a better median air quality index at 2.0 compared to 1.0 in Kingsport.
- Air quality is better in Charleston with an average index of 1.72 compared to 1.56 in Kingsport.
- Charleston experiences more days with poor air quality at 33 compared to 25 in Kingsport.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.