Demographics details for Kelso, TN vs Fishing creek, MD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Kelso, TN vs Fishing creek, MD.

Data Kelso Fishing creek
Population 185 235
Median Age 42.0 years 55.9 years
Median Income $60,000 $76,250
Married Families 70.0% 58.0%
Poverty Level 13% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Kelso vs Fishing creek

  • The population in Fishing creek is higher at 235, compared to 185 in Kelso.
  • The median age in Fishing creek is higher at 55.9 years, compared to 42.0 years in Kelso.
  • Fishing creek has a higher median income of $76,250, compared to $60,000 in Kelso.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Kelso at 70.0% compared to 58.0% in Fishing creek.
  • Kelso has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Kelso and Fishing creek at 3.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Kelso vs Fishing creek provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Kelso Fishing creek
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 100 100
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating Data is updating
Two or More Races Data is updating Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Kelso vs Fishing creek

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Kelso and Fishing creek at 0%.
  • The percentage of White residents is the same in both Kelso and Fishing creek at 100%.
  • Both Kelso and Fishing creek have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Kelso and Fishing creek at 0%.
  • Both Kelso and Fishing creek have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 0%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kelso and Fishing creek at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Kelso Fishing creek
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 15.3%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 9.6%
Depression Data is updating% 21.2%
Smoking Data is updating% 15.1%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 16.8%
Obesity Data is updating% 33.1%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 28.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Kelso vs Fishing creek

  • In Fishing creek, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.3% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Fishing creek at 21.2% versus 0.0% in Kelso.
  • Fishing creek has a higher smoking rate at 15.1% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Fishing creek at 16.8% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
  • Fishing creek has higher obesity rates at 33.1% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fishing creek at 28.0% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Kelso Fishing creek
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 34.5% (81)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 16.2% (38)

Education Levels Comparison: Kelso vs Fishing creek

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Kelso and Fishing creek at 0.0%.
  • In Fishing creek, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 34.5% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
  • Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 0.0%.
  • In Fishing creek, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.