Environment details: Kelso TN
moderate quality, some attention necessary.
Environment details: Fishing creek MD
generally good quality; minimal treatment needed.
Compare Environment: Kelso TN vs Fishing creek MD
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Kelso | Fishing creek |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 741 | 421 |
| Water Quality | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | moderate quality, some attention necessary. | generally good quality; minimal treatment needed. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.6 | 1.86 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 24 | 55 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Kelso vs Fishing creek
- The water quality in Fishing creek is superior at 7/10 compared to 5/10 in Kelso.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Fishing creek with an average index of 1.86 compared to 1.6 in Kelso.
- Fishing creek experiences more days with poor air quality at 55 compared to 24 in Kelso.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.