Demographics details for Hoover, AL vs Snellville, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hoover, AL vs Snellville, GA.
| Data | Hoover | Snellville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 92,435 | 22,024 |
| Median Age | 38.3 years | 42.1 years |
| Median Income | $101,765 | $88,586 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Hoover vs Snellville
- In Hoover, the population is higher at 92,435, compared to 22,024 in Snellville.
- The median age in Snellville is higher at 42.1 years, compared to 38.3 years in Hoover.
- Hoover has a higher median income of $101,765 compared to $88,586 in Snellville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hoover at 46.0% compared to 42.0% in Snellville.
- The poverty level is higher in Snellville at 10%, compared to 7% in Hoover.
- Snellville has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.2% in Hoover.
Demographics
Demographics Hoover vs Snellville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hoover | Snellville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 20 | 38 |
| White | 67 | 34 |
| Asian | 5 | 9 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hoover vs Snellville
- In Snellville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 20% in Hoover.
- Hoover has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 34% in Snellville.
- In Snellville, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 5% in Hoover.
- Snellville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 5% in Hoover.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Snellville at 6%, compared to 3% in Hoover.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hoover and Snellville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hoover | Snellville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 14.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.6% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 21.3% | 18.2% |
| Smoking | 11.0% | 13.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 32.1% | 31.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hoover vs Snellville
- More residents in Hoover report poor mental health at 14.9% compared to 14.6% in Snellville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hoover at 21.3% compared to 18.2% in Snellville.
- Snellville has a higher smoking rate at 13.1% compared to 11.0% in Hoover.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hoover at 16.7% compared to 15.1% in Snellville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hoover at 32.1% compared to 31.9% in Snellville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Snellville at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Hoover.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hoover | Snellville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (583) | 0.4% (94) |
| High School Diploma | 7.3% (6,787) | 13.5% (2,970) |
| Less than High School | 3.8% (3,478) | 10.1% (2,226) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 41.1% (38,000) | 24.8% (5,469) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hoover vs Snellville
- A higher percentage of residents in Hoover have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Snellville.
- In Snellville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.5% compared to 7.3% in Hoover.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Snellville at 10.1%, compared to 3.8% in Hoover.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hoover hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.1% compared to 24.8% in Snellville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.