Demographics details for Hattiesburg, MS vs Rudd, IA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Hattiesburg, MS vs Rudd, IA.

Data Hattiesburg Rudd
Population 48,455 348
Median Age 28.5 years 37.3 years
Median Income $41,024 $70,375
Married Families 23.0% 51.0%
Poverty Level 23% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.2

Population Comparison: Hattiesburg vs Rudd

  • In Hattiesburg, the population is higher at 48,455, compared to 348 in Rudd.
  • The median age in Rudd is higher at 37.3 years, compared to 28.5 years in Hattiesburg.
  • Rudd has a higher median income of $70,375, compared to $41,024 in Hattiesburg.
  • In Rudd, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 23.0% in Hattiesburg.
  • Hattiesburg has a higher poverty level at 23% compared to 0% in Rudd.
  • The unemployment rate in Hattiesburg is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Rudd.

Demographics

Demographics Hattiesburg vs Rudd provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Hattiesburg Rudd
Black 52 Data is updating
White 38 98
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 4 Data is updating
Two or More Races 5 1
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Hattiesburg vs Rudd

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hattiesburg at 52% compared to 0% in Rudd.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Rudd at 98% compared to 38% in Hattiesburg.
  • Both Hattiesburg and Rudd have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Hattiesburg at 4% compared to 0% in Rudd.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Hattiesburg at 5% compared to 1% in Rudd.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hattiesburg and Rudd at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Hattiesburg Rudd
Mental Health Not Good 17.3% 14.7%
Physical Health Not Good 13.3% 9.2%
Depression 20.7% 18.0%
Smoking 20.8% 16.8%
Binge Drinking 12.9% 23.0%
Obesity 43.0% 37.3%
Disability Percentage 19.0% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Hattiesburg vs Rudd

  • More residents in Hattiesburg report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 14.7% in Rudd.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Hattiesburg at 20.7% compared to 18.0% in Rudd.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Hattiesburg at 20.8% compared to 16.8% in Rudd.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Rudd at 23.0% compared to 12.9% in Hattiesburg.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Hattiesburg at 43.0% compared to 37.3% in Rudd.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Hattiesburg and Rudd at 19.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Hattiesburg Rudd
No Schooling 0.7% (362) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 10.4% (5,022) 33.0% (115)
Less than High School 7.5% (3,642) 16.7% (58)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 20.2% (9,782) 9.5% (33)

Education Levels Comparison: Hattiesburg vs Rudd

  • A higher percentage of residents in Hattiesburg have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Rudd.
  • In Rudd, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 33.0% compared to 10.4% in Hattiesburg.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rudd at 16.7%, compared to 7.5% in Hattiesburg.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Hattiesburg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.2% compared to 9.5% in Rudd.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.