Environment details: Hattiesburg MS
water quality is acceptable; few contaminants found.
Environment details: Rudd IA
Average quality, affected by general runoff.
Compare Environment: Hattiesburg MS vs Rudd IA
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Hattiesburg | Rudd |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 504 | 585 |
| Water Quality | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | water quality is acceptable; few contaminants found. | Average quality, affected by general runoff. |
| Median Air Quality | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.54 | 1.65 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 21 | 21 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Hattiesburg vs Rudd
- Water quality is rated higher in Hattiesburg at 6/10 compared to 5/10 in Rudd.
- Rudd has a better median air quality index at 2.0 compared to 1.0 in Hattiesburg.
- Air quality is better in Rudd with an average index of 1.65 compared to 1.54 in Hattiesburg.
- Both cities report the same number of days with poor air quality at 21.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.