Demographics details for Gretna, NE vs Charlottesville, VA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Gretna, NE vs Charlottesville, VA.

Data Gretna Charlottesville
Population 9,071 45,373
Median Age 35.7 years 32.4 years
Median Income $117,553 $67,177
Married Families 43.0% 30.0%
Poverty Level 5% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 2.7

Population Comparison: Gretna vs Charlottesville

  • The population in Charlottesville is higher at 45,373, compared to 9,071 in Gretna.
  • Residents in Gretna have a higher median age of 35.7 years compared to 32.4 years in Charlottesville.
  • Gretna has a higher median income of $117,553 compared to $67,177 in Charlottesville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Gretna at 43.0% compared to 30.0% in Charlottesville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Charlottesville at 12%, compared to 5% in Gretna.
  • The unemployment rate in Gretna is higher at 3.2%, compared to 2.7% in Charlottesville.

Demographics

Demographics Gretna vs Charlottesville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Gretna Charlottesville
Black Data is updating 18
White 93 63
Asian Data is updating 7
Hispanic 4 6
Two or More Races 3 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Gretna vs Charlottesville

  • In Charlottesville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 0% in Gretna.
  • Gretna has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 63% in Charlottesville.
  • In Charlottesville, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Gretna.
  • Charlottesville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 4% in Gretna.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Charlottesville at 6%, compared to 3% in Gretna.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gretna and Charlottesville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Gretna Charlottesville
Mental Health Not Good 12.0% 16.4%
Physical Health Not Good 7.0% 10.5%
Depression 17.5% 22.4%
Smoking 11.0% 15.0%
Binge Drinking 21.8% 16.7%
Obesity 35.0% 32.9%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Gretna vs Charlottesville

  • In Charlottesville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 12.0% in Gretna.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Charlottesville at 22.4% versus 17.5% in Gretna.
  • Charlottesville has a higher smoking rate at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Gretna.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Gretna at 21.8% compared to 16.7% in Charlottesville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Gretna at 35.0% compared to 32.9% in Charlottesville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Charlottesville at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Gretna.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Gretna Charlottesville
No Schooling 0.1% (9) 1.1% (495)
High School Diploma 10.9% (988) 7.8% (3,550)
Less than High School 2.8% (252) 7.6% (3,427)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 31.3% (2,839) 38.2% (17,339)

Education Levels Comparison: Gretna vs Charlottesville

  • In Charlottesville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.1% in Gretna.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Gretna hold a high school diploma at 10.9% compared to 7.8% in Charlottesville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Charlottesville at 7.6%, compared to 2.8% in Gretna.
  • In Charlottesville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.2% compared to 31.3% in Gretna.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.