Demographics details for Gresham, OR vs Richmond, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gresham, OR vs Richmond, CA.
| Data | Gresham | Richmond |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 111,621 | 216,288 |
| Median Age | 37.3 years | 36.0 years |
| Median Income | $69,437 | $73,000 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 40000.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 0.08 |
Population Comparison: Gresham vs Richmond
- The population in Richmond is higher at 216,288, compared to 111,621 in Gresham.
- Residents in Gresham have a higher median age of 37.3 years compared to 36.0 years in Richmond.
- Richmond has a higher median income of $73,000, compared to $69,437 in Gresham.
- In Richmond, the percentage of married families is higher at 40000.0%, compared to 38.0% in Gresham.
- Gresham has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 0% in Richmond.
- The unemployment rate in Gresham is higher at 3.9%, compared to 0.08% in Richmond.
Demographics
Demographics Gresham vs Richmond provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gresham | Richmond |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 30 |
| White | 55 | 36 |
| Asian | 5 | 14 |
| Hispanic | 22 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gresham vs Richmond
- In Richmond, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 30% compared to 4% in Gresham.
- Gresham has a higher percentage of White residents at 55% compared to 36% in Richmond.
- In Richmond, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 5% in Gresham.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gresham at 22% compared to 20% in Richmond.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gresham at 13% compared to 5% in Richmond.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Gresham at 1% compared to 0% in Richmond.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gresham | Richmond |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 28.4% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.2% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 28.6% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gresham vs Richmond
- More residents in Gresham report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gresham at 28.4% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gresham at 17.6% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gresham at 20.2% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
- Obesity rates are higher in Gresham at 28.6% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
- Disability percentages are higher in Gresham at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gresham | Richmond |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (1,757) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 15.0% (16,776) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 16.5% (18,399) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (18,082) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gresham vs Richmond
- A higher percentage of residents in Gresham have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gresham hold a high school diploma at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
- More residents in Gresham have less than a high school education at 16.5% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gresham hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.