Demographics details for Greensboro, NC vs Draper, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Greensboro, NC vs Draper, UT.
Data | Greensboro | Draper |
---|---|---|
Population | 301,115 | 50,731 |
Median Age | 34.0 years | 33.6 years |
Median Income | $55,051 | $126,041 |
Married Families | 29.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Greensboro vs Draper
- In Greensboro, the population is higher at 301,115, compared to 50,731 in Draper.
- Residents in Greensboro have a higher median age of 34.0 years compared to 33.6 years in Draper.
- Draper has a higher median income of $126,041, compared to $55,051 in Greensboro.
- In Draper, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 29.0% in Greensboro.
- Greensboro has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 0% in Draper.
- The unemployment rate in Greensboro is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.0% in Draper.
Demographics
Demographics Greensboro vs Draper provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Greensboro | Draper |
---|---|---|
Black | 42 | 2 |
White | 38 | 81 |
Asian | 5 | 4 |
Hispanic | 9 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Greensboro vs Draper
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Greensboro at 42% compared to 2% in Draper.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Draper at 81% compared to 38% in Greensboro.
- The Asian population is larger in Greensboro at 5% compared to 4% in Draper.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Greensboro at 9% compared to 7% in Draper.
- Both Greensboro and Draper have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Greensboro and Draper at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Greensboro | Draper |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 16.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 8.7% |
Depression | 22.2% | 25.3% |
Smoking | 15.6% | 7.1% |
Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 16.7% |
Obesity | 36.5% | 28.2% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Greensboro vs Draper
- In Draper, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 15.8% in Greensboro.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Draper at 25.3% versus 22.2% in Greensboro.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Greensboro at 15.6% compared to 7.1% in Draper.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Draper at 16.7% compared to 15.5% in Greensboro.
- Obesity rates are higher in Greensboro at 36.5% compared to 28.2% in Draper.
- Disability percentages are higher in Greensboro at 11.0% compared to 6.0% in Draper.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Greensboro | Draper |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (3,655) | 0.7% (347) |
High School Diploma | 11.5% (34,595) | 7.4% (3,771) |
Less than High School | 8.9% (26,682) | 4.1% (2,077) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.2% (75,909) | 30.1% (15,258) |
Education Levels Comparison: Greensboro vs Draper
- A higher percentage of residents in Greensboro have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.7% in Draper.
- A higher percentage of residents in Greensboro hold a high school diploma at 11.5% compared to 7.4% in Draper.
- More residents in Greensboro have less than a high school education at 8.9% compared to 4.1% in Draper.
- In Draper, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.1% compared to 25.2% in Greensboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.