Demographics details for Graceville, FL vs Swan lake, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Graceville, FL vs Swan lake, NY.
| Data | Graceville | Swan lake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,175 | 331 |
| Median Age | 31.7 years | 40.0 years |
| Median Income | $36,625 | $55,000 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Graceville vs Swan lake
- In Graceville, the population is higher at 2,175, compared to 331 in Swan lake.
- The median age in Swan lake is higher at 40.0 years, compared to 31.7 years in Graceville.
- Swan lake has a higher median income of $55,000, compared to $36,625 in Graceville.
- In Swan lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 41.0% in Graceville.
- Graceville has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 5% in Swan lake.
- The unemployment rate in Graceville is higher at 3.2%, compared to 3.0% in Swan lake.
Demographics
Demographics Graceville vs Swan lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Graceville | Swan lake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 32 | 5 |
| White | 59 | 80 |
| Asian | 1 | 10 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Graceville vs Swan lake
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Graceville at 32% compared to 5% in Swan lake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Swan lake at 80% compared to 59% in Graceville.
- In Swan lake, the Asian population stands at 10%, greater than 1% in Graceville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Graceville at 6% compared to 5% in Swan lake.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Graceville at 2% compared to 0% in Swan lake.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Graceville and Swan lake at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Graceville | Swan lake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 22.2% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 24.4% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 33.6% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Graceville vs Swan lake
- More residents in Graceville report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 0.0% in Swan lake.
- Depression is more prevalent in Graceville at 22.2% compared to 0.0% in Swan lake.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Graceville at 24.4% compared to 0.0% in Swan lake.
- Binge drinking is more common in Graceville at 15.8% compared to 0.0% in Swan lake.
- Obesity rates are higher in Graceville at 33.6% compared to 0.0% in Swan lake.
- Disability percentages are higher in Graceville at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Swan lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Graceville | Swan lake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (58) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 25.3% (550) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 22.5% (490) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.2% (331) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Graceville vs Swan lake
- A higher percentage of residents in Graceville have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Swan lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Graceville hold a high school diploma at 25.3% compared to 0.0% in Swan lake.
- More residents in Graceville have less than a high school education at 22.5% compared to 0.0% in Swan lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Graceville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.2% compared to 0.0% in Swan lake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.