Environment details: Graceville FL
acceptable overall; minor concerns exist.
Environment details: Swan lake NY
water quality is poor, monitoring necessary.
Compare Environment: Graceville FL vs Swan lake NY
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Graceville | Swan lake |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 1811 | 1248 |
| Water Quality | 6/10 | 3/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | acceptable overall; minor concerns exist. | water quality is poor, monitoring necessary. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.58 | 1.71 |
| Worst AQI | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 26 | 28 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Graceville vs Swan lake
- Water quality is rated higher in Graceville at 6/10 compared to 3/10 in Swan lake.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Swan lake with an average index of 1.71 compared to 1.58 in Graceville.
- Swan lake experiences more days with poor air quality at 28 compared to 26 in Graceville.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.