Demographics details for Glendale, AZ vs Mount olive, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Glendale, AZ vs Mount olive, MS.
| Data | Glendale | Mount olive |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 252,136 | 878 |
| Median Age | 34.1 years | 31.7 years |
| Median Income | $66,375 | $53,947 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 49.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Glendale vs Mount olive
- In Glendale, the population is higher at 252,136, compared to 878 in Mount olive.
- Residents in Glendale have a higher median age of 34.1 years compared to 31.7 years in Mount olive.
- Glendale has a higher median income of $66,375 compared to $53,947 in Mount olive.
- In Mount olive, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 33.0% in Glendale.
- The poverty level is higher in Mount olive at 18%, compared to 11% in Glendale.
- Mount olive has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 3.6% in Glendale.
Demographics
Demographics Glendale vs Mount olive provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Glendale | Mount olive |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 120 |
| White | 28 | 145 |
| Asian | 4 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 40 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 19 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Glendale vs Mount olive
- In Mount olive, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 120% compared to 7% in Glendale.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mount olive at 145% compared to 28% in Glendale.
- The Asian population is larger in Glendale at 4% compared to 2% in Mount olive.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Glendale at 40% compared to 0% in Mount olive.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Glendale at 19% compared to 0% in Mount olive.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Glendale at 2% compared to 0% in Mount olive.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Glendale | Mount olive |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 20.2% | 21.5% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 21.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 13.0% |
| Obesity | 32.9% | 43.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Glendale vs Mount olive
- More residents in Glendale report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 17.8% in Mount olive.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mount olive at 21.5% versus 20.2% in Glendale.
- Mount olive has a higher smoking rate at 21.3% compared to 17.2% in Glendale.
- Binge drinking is more common in Glendale at 16.8% compared to 13.0% in Mount olive.
- Mount olive has higher obesity rates at 43.6% compared to 32.9% in Glendale.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mount olive at 27.0% compared to 13.0% in Glendale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Glendale | Mount olive |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (4,190) | 2.3% (20) |
| High School Diploma | 14.7% (37,119) | 23.9% (210) |
| Less than High School | 18.6% (46,911) | 14.9% (131) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.2% (35,878) | 13.0% (114) |
Education Levels Comparison: Glendale vs Mount olive
- In Mount olive, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 1.7% in Glendale.
- In Mount olive, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.9% compared to 14.7% in Glendale.
- More residents in Glendale have less than a high school education at 18.6% compared to 14.9% in Mount olive.
- A higher percentage of residents in Glendale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.2% compared to 13.0% in Mount olive.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.