Demographics details for Glen elder, KS vs Martinsdale, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Glen elder, KS vs Martinsdale, MT.
| Data | Glen elder | Martinsdale |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 363 | 37 |
| Median Age | 42.7 years | 40.8 years |
| Median Income | $65,417 | $55,489 |
| Married Families | 80.0% | Data is updating |
| Poverty Level | 10% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Glen elder vs Martinsdale
- In Glen elder, the population is higher at 363, compared to 37 in Martinsdale.
- Residents in Glen elder have a higher median age of 42.7 years compared to 40.8 years in Martinsdale.
- Glen elder has a higher median income of $65,417 compared to $55,489 in Martinsdale.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Glen elder at 80.0% compared to 0.0% in Martinsdale.
- Glen elder has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Martinsdale.
- Martinsdale has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 3.0% in Glen elder.
Demographics
Demographics Glen elder vs Martinsdale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Glen elder | Martinsdale |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 86 | 100 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 5 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Glen elder vs Martinsdale
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Glen elder and Martinsdale at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Martinsdale at 100% compared to 86% in Glen elder.
- The Asian population is larger in Glen elder at 2% compared to 0% in Martinsdale.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Glen elder at 7% compared to 0% in Martinsdale.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Glen elder at 5% compared to 0% in Martinsdale.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Glen elder and Martinsdale at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Glen elder | Martinsdale |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 12.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 21.3% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 17.7% | 16.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.5% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 35.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Glen elder vs Martinsdale
- More residents in Glen elder report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 12.2% in Martinsdale.
- Depression is more prevalent in Glen elder at 21.3% compared to 20.1% in Martinsdale.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Glen elder at 17.7% compared to 16.8% in Martinsdale.
- Binge drinking is more common in Glen elder at 19.5% compared to 14.5% in Martinsdale.
- Obesity rates are higher in Glen elder at 38.5% compared to 35.3% in Martinsdale.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Glen elder and Martinsdale at 22.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Glen elder | Martinsdale |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (2) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 30.3% (110) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 1.7% (6) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.5% (60) | 81.1% (30) |
Education Levels Comparison: Glen elder vs Martinsdale
- A higher percentage of residents in Glen elder have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Martinsdale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Glen elder hold a high school diploma at 30.3% compared to 0.0% in Martinsdale.
- More residents in Glen elder have less than a high school education at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Martinsdale.
- In Martinsdale, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 81.1% compared to 16.5% in Glen elder.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.