Environment details: Glen elder KS
Moderate quality; health risk in downstream areas.
Environment details: Martinsdale MT
Water quality is fair, some local pollutants detected.
Compare Environment: Glen elder KS vs Martinsdale MT
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
Metric | Glen elder | Martinsdale |
---|---|---|
CO2 Emissions | 478 | 228 |
Water Quality | 5/10 | 4/10 |
Water Quality Explanation | Moderate quality; health risk in downstream areas. | Water quality is fair, some local pollutants detected. |
Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Average Air Quality Index | 1.75 | 1.77 |
Worst AQI | 4.0 | 5.0 |
Days with Poor AQI | 26 | 21 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Glen elder vs Martinsdale
- Water quality is rated higher in Glen elder at 5/10 compared to 4/10 in Martinsdale.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Martinsdale with an average index of 1.77 compared to 1.75 in Glen elder.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Glen elder at 26 compared to 21 in Martinsdale.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.