Demographics details for Fort washington, MD vs Ephrata, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort washington, MD vs Ephrata, WA.
| Data | Fort washington | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,825 | 8,476 |
| Median Age | 44.1 years | 33.4 years |
| Median Income | $143,623 | $57,958 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Fort washington vs Ephrata
- In Fort washington, the population is higher at 25,825, compared to 8,476 in Ephrata.
- Residents in Fort washington have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 33.4 years in Ephrata.
- Fort washington has a higher median income of $143,623 compared to $57,958 in Ephrata.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort washington at 43.0% compared to 33.0% in Ephrata.
- The poverty level is higher in Ephrata at 11%, compared to 5% in Fort washington.
- Ephrata has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Fort washington.
Demographics
Demographics Fort washington vs Ephrata provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort washington | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 61 | 1 |
| White | 8 | 63 |
| Asian | 8 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 17 | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort washington vs Ephrata
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort washington at 61% compared to 1% in Ephrata.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ephrata at 63% compared to 8% in Fort washington.
- The Asian population is larger in Fort washington at 8% compared to 0% in Ephrata.
- Ephrata has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 17% in Fort washington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ephrata at 11%, compared to 6% in Fort washington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort washington and Ephrata at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort washington | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.5% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.9% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 11.6% | 27.0% |
| Smoking | 9.6% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.0% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 37.7% | 35.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort washington vs Ephrata
- In Ephrata, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 12.5% in Fort washington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ephrata at 27.0% versus 11.6% in Fort washington.
- Ephrata has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 9.6% in Fort washington.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ephrata at 17.6% compared to 12.0% in Fort washington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort washington at 37.7% compared to 35.1% in Ephrata.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort washington at 9.0% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort washington | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (297) | 0.8% (65) |
| High School Diploma | 14.4% (3,710) | 17.7% (1,503) |
| Less than High School | 8.3% (2,138) | 14.4% (1,223) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.8% (8,208) | 8.0% (677) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort washington vs Ephrata
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort washington have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.8% in Ephrata.
- In Ephrata, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.7% compared to 14.4% in Fort washington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ephrata at 14.4%, compared to 8.3% in Fort washington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort washington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.