Environment details: Fort washington MD
water quality is fair; may need treatment.
Environment details: Ephrata WA
Water quality acceptable; few contaminants present.
Compare Environment: Fort washington MD vs Ephrata WA
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Fort washington | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 421 | 590 |
| Water Quality | 4/10 | 6/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | water quality is fair; may need treatment. | Water quality acceptable; few contaminants present. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.8 | 1.75 |
| Worst AQI | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 57 | 39 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Fort washington vs Ephrata
- The water quality in Ephrata is superior at 6/10 compared to 4/10 in Fort washington.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- The average air quality index is worse in Fort washington with 1.8 compared to 1.75 in Ephrata.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Fort washington at 57 compared to 39 in Ephrata.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.