Demographics details for Fishers, IN vs Pontiac, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fishers, IN vs Pontiac, IL.
Data | Fishers | Pontiac |
---|---|---|
Population | 101,966 | 11,085 |
Median Age | 37.1 years | 41.4 years |
Median Income | $126,548 | $55,226 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Fishers vs Pontiac
- In Fishers, the population is higher at 101,966, compared to 11,085 in Pontiac.
- The median age in Pontiac is higher at 41.4 years, compared to 37.1 years in Fishers.
- Fishers has a higher median income of $126,548 compared to $55,226 in Pontiac.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fishers at 47.0% compared to 35.0% in Pontiac.
- The poverty level is higher in Pontiac at 10%, compared to 5% in Fishers.
- Pontiac has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Fishers.
Demographics
Demographics Fishers vs Pontiac provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fishers | Pontiac |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 10 |
White | 80 | 80 |
Asian | 8 | 1 |
Hispanic | 3 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fishers vs Pontiac
- In Pontiac, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 5% in Fishers.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Fishers and Pontiac at 80%.
- The Asian population is larger in Fishers at 8% compared to 1% in Pontiac.
- Pontiac has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Fishers.
- Both Fishers and Pontiac have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fishers and Pontiac at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fishers | Pontiac |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.5% | 17.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.1% | 12.9% |
Depression | 22.2% | 21.4% |
Smoking | 9.4% | 21.3% |
Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 17.3% |
Obesity | 27.8% | 40.8% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fishers vs Pontiac
- In Pontiac, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 12.5% in Fishers.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fishers at 22.2% compared to 21.4% in Pontiac.
- Pontiac has a higher smoking rate at 21.3% compared to 9.4% in Fishers.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pontiac at 17.3% compared to 17.0% in Fishers.
- Pontiac has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 27.8% in Fishers.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pontiac at 15.0% compared to 7.0% in Fishers.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fishers | Pontiac |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (418) | 0.4% (41) |
High School Diploma | 6.5% (6,652) | 24.5% (2,711) |
Less than High School | 2.0% (2,037) | 15.6% (1,726) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 41.2% (42,051) | 12.6% (1,401) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fishers vs Pontiac
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Fishers and Pontiac at 0.4%.
- In Pontiac, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.5% compared to 6.5% in Fishers.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pontiac at 15.6%, compared to 2.0% in Fishers.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fishers hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.2% compared to 12.6% in Pontiac.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.