Demographics details for Faribault, MN vs Clearlake, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Faribault, MN vs Clearlake, CA.
Data | Faribault | Clearlake |
---|---|---|
Population | 24,518 | 16,693 |
Median Age | 38.7 years | 38.6 years |
Median Income | $58,881 | $41,047 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 21% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 7.2 |
Population Comparison: Faribault vs Clearlake
- In Faribault, the population is higher at 24,518, compared to 16,693 in Clearlake.
- Residents in Faribault have a higher median age of 38.7 years compared to 38.6 years in Clearlake.
- Faribault has a higher median income of $58,881 compared to $41,047 in Clearlake.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Faribault at 33.0% compared to 25.0% in Clearlake.
- The poverty level is higher in Clearlake at 21%, compared to 8% in Faribault.
- Clearlake has a higher unemployment rate at 7.2% compared to 3.2% in Faribault.
Demographics
Demographics Faribault vs Clearlake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Faribault | Clearlake |
---|---|---|
Black | 15 | 4 |
White | 64 | 48 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 14 | 30 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 13 |
American Indian | 1 | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Faribault vs Clearlake
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Faribault at 15% compared to 4% in Clearlake.
- Faribault has a higher percentage of White residents at 64% compared to 48% in Clearlake.
- Both Faribault and Clearlake have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Clearlake has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 14% in Faribault.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clearlake at 13%, compared to 5% in Faribault.
- In Clearlake, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 1% in Faribault.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Faribault | Clearlake |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 21.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 17.0% |
Depression | 21.0% | 24.7% |
Smoking | 21.6% | 22.8% |
Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 15.2% |
Obesity | 40.0% | 37.7% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Faribault vs Clearlake
- In Clearlake, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.9% compared to 15.5% in Faribault.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clearlake at 24.7% versus 21.0% in Faribault.
- Clearlake has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 21.6% in Faribault.
- Binge drinking is more common in Faribault at 18.1% compared to 15.2% in Clearlake.
- Obesity rates are higher in Faribault at 40.0% compared to 37.7% in Clearlake.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clearlake at 23.0% compared to 11.0% in Faribault.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Faribault | Clearlake |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.1% (513) | 0.6% (103) |
High School Diploma | 22.3% (5,456) | 19.1% (3,190) |
Less than High School | 14.1% (3,450) | 25.8% (4,311) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.2% (2,982) | 5.3% (883) |
Education Levels Comparison: Faribault vs Clearlake
- A higher percentage of residents in Faribault have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.6% in Clearlake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Faribault hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 19.1% in Clearlake.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clearlake at 25.8%, compared to 14.1% in Faribault.
- A higher percentage of residents in Faribault hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.2% compared to 5.3% in Clearlake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.