Demographics details for Faribault, MN vs Chapman, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Faribault, MN vs Chapman, KS.
| Data | Faribault | Chapman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,518 | 1,371 |
| Median Age | 38.7 years | 41.4 years |
| Median Income | $58,881 | $66,964 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Faribault vs Chapman
- In Faribault, the population is higher at 24,518, compared to 1,371 in Chapman.
- The median age in Chapman is higher at 41.4 years, compared to 38.7 years in Faribault.
- Chapman has a higher median income of $66,964, compared to $58,881 in Faribault.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Faribault and Chapman at 33.0%.
- The poverty level is identical in both Faribault and Chapman at 8%.
- The unemployment rate in Faribault is higher at 3.2%, compared to 3.1% in Chapman.
Demographics
Demographics Faribault vs Chapman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Faribault | Chapman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | Data is updating |
| White | 64 | 81 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 14 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Faribault vs Chapman
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Faribault at 15% compared to 0% in Chapman.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chapman at 81% compared to 64% in Faribault.
- In Chapman, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Faribault.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Faribault at 14% compared to 7% in Chapman.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chapman at 7%, compared to 5% in Faribault.
- In Chapman, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Faribault.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Faribault | Chapman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 9.5% |
| Depression | 21.0% | 21.4% |
| Smoking | 21.6% | 16.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 20.2% |
| Obesity | 40.0% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Faribault vs Chapman
- In Chapman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 15.5% in Faribault.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chapman at 21.4% versus 21.0% in Faribault.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Faribault at 21.6% compared to 16.6% in Chapman.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chapman at 20.2% compared to 18.1% in Faribault.
- Obesity rates are higher in Faribault at 40.0% compared to 37.3% in Chapman.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chapman at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Faribault.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Faribault | Chapman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (513) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 22.3% (5,456) | 12.3% (168) |
| Less than High School | 14.1% (3,450) | 5.1% (70) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.2% (2,982) | 15.5% (212) |
Education Levels Comparison: Faribault vs Chapman
- A higher percentage of residents in Faribault have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in Chapman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Faribault hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 12.3% in Chapman.
- More residents in Faribault have less than a high school education at 14.1% compared to 5.1% in Chapman.
- In Chapman, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 12.2% in Faribault.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.