Environment details: Faribault MN
poor quality, significant contaminants found.
Environment details: Chapman KS
Water quality is good, low levels of impurities.
Compare Environment: Faribault MN vs Chapman KS
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Faribault | Chapman |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 665 | 478 |
| Water Quality | 3/10 | 8/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | poor quality, significant contaminants found. | Water quality is good, low levels of impurities. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.62 | 1.73 |
| Worst AQI | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 18 | 26 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Faribault vs Chapman
- The water quality in Chapman is superior at 8/10 compared to 3/10 in Faribault.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Chapman with an average index of 1.73 compared to 1.62 in Faribault.
- Chapman experiences more days with poor air quality at 26 compared to 18 in Faribault.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.