Demographics details for Faribault, MN vs Chandler, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Faribault, MN vs Chandler, OK.
| Data | Faribault | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,518 | 2,895 |
| Median Age | 38.7 years | 40.5 years |
| Median Income | $58,881 | $48,168 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Faribault vs Chandler
- In Faribault, the population is higher at 24,518, compared to 2,895 in Chandler.
- The median age in Chandler is higher at 40.5 years, compared to 38.7 years in Faribault.
- Faribault has a higher median income of $58,881 compared to $48,168 in Chandler.
- In Chandler, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 33.0% in Faribault.
- The poverty level is higher in Chandler at 13%, compared to 8% in Faribault.
- Chandler has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Faribault.
Demographics
Demographics Faribault vs Chandler provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Faribault | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 9 |
| White | 64 | 72 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 14 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 13 |
| American Indian | 1 | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Faribault vs Chandler
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Faribault at 15% compared to 9% in Chandler.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chandler at 72% compared to 64% in Faribault.
- In Chandler, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Faribault.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Faribault at 14% compared to 1% in Chandler.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chandler at 13%, compared to 5% in Faribault.
- In Chandler, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 1% in Faribault.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Faribault | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 21.0% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 21.6% | 20.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 40.0% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Faribault vs Chandler
- In Chandler, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 15.5% in Faribault.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chandler at 24.6% versus 21.0% in Faribault.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Faribault at 21.6% compared to 20.3% in Chandler.
- Binge drinking is more common in Faribault at 18.1% compared to 14.6% in Chandler.
- Chandler has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 40.0% in Faribault.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chandler at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Faribault.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Faribault | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (513) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 22.3% (5,456) | 23.9% (691) |
| Less than High School | 14.1% (3,450) | 12.8% (372) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.2% (2,982) | 16.2% (469) |
Education Levels Comparison: Faribault vs Chandler
- A higher percentage of residents in Faribault have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in Chandler.
- In Chandler, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.9% compared to 22.3% in Faribault.
- More residents in Faribault have less than a high school education at 14.1% compared to 12.8% in Chandler.
- In Chandler, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 12.2% in Faribault.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.