Environment details: Faribault MN
poor quality, significant contaminants found.
Environment details: Chandler OK
Water quality is poor, affected by local industries.
Compare Environment: Faribault MN vs Chandler OK
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Faribault | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 665 | 702 |
| Water Quality | 3/10 | 3/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | poor quality, significant contaminants found. | Water quality is poor, affected by local industries. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.62 | 1.72 |
| Worst AQI | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 18 | 30 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Faribault vs Chandler
- Both cities report the same water quality at 3/10.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Chandler with an average index of 1.72 compared to 1.62 in Faribault.
- Chandler experiences more days with poor air quality at 30 compared to 18 in Faribault.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.