Demographics details for Fargo, ND vs Lancaster, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fargo, ND vs Lancaster, SC.
| Data | Fargo | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 131,444 | 104,577 |
| Median Age | 31.9 years | 42.2 years |
| Median Income | $64,432 | $72,186 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.4 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Fargo vs Lancaster
- In Fargo, the population is higher at 131,444, compared to 104,577 in Lancaster.
- The median age in Lancaster is higher at 42.2 years, compared to 31.9 years in Fargo.
- Lancaster has a higher median income of $72,186, compared to $64,432 in Fargo.
- In Lancaster, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 34.0% in Fargo.
- Fargo has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 2.4% in Fargo.
Demographics
Demographics Fargo vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fargo | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 18 |
| White | 80 | 70 |
| Asian | 4 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fargo vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 8% in Fargo.
- Fargo has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 70% in Lancaster.
- The Asian population is larger in Fargo at 4% compared to 2% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 3% in Fargo.
- Both Fargo and Lancaster have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fargo at 1% compared to 0% in Lancaster.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fargo | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.8% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 11.0% |
| Depression | 20.0% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 14.5% | 16.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.0% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 35.8% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fargo vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 12.8% in Fargo.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lancaster at 22.0% versus 20.0% in Fargo.
- Lancaster has a higher smoking rate at 16.9% compared to 14.5% in Fargo.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fargo at 21.0% compared to 17.3% in Lancaster.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fargo at 35.8% compared to 32.9% in Lancaster.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lancaster at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Fargo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fargo | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (1,161) | 0.7% (689) |
| High School Diploma | 9.6% (12,580) | 16.0% (16,691) |
| Less than High School | 4.9% (6,436) | 12.5% (13,112) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.7% (33,817) | 20.2% (21,156) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fargo vs Lancaster
- A higher percentage of residents in Fargo have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.7% in Lancaster.
- In Lancaster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.0% compared to 9.6% in Fargo.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lancaster at 12.5%, compared to 4.9% in Fargo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fargo hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.7% compared to 20.2% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.