Demographics details for Falls church, VA vs Livermore, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Falls church, VA vs Livermore, CA.
| Data | Falls church | Livermore |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,586 | 84,701 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 40.3 years |
| Median Income | $164,536 | $152,590 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Falls church vs Livermore
- The population in Livermore is higher at 84,701, compared to 14,586 in Falls church.
- The median age in Livermore is higher at 40.3 years, compared to 38.8 years in Falls church.
- Falls church has a higher median income of $164,536 compared to $152,590 in Livermore.
- In Livermore, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 43.0% in Falls church.
- Falls church has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 5% in Livermore.
- Livermore has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 2.5% in Falls church.
Demographics
Demographics Falls church vs Livermore provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Falls church | Livermore |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 2 |
| White | 65 | 44 |
| Asian | 9 | 17 |
| Hispanic | 11 | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Falls church vs Livermore
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Falls church at 5% compared to 2% in Livermore.
- Falls church has a higher percentage of White residents at 65% compared to 44% in Livermore.
- In Livermore, the Asian population stands at 17%, greater than 9% in Falls church.
- Livermore has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 11% in Falls church.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Livermore at 13%, compared to 10% in Falls church.
- In Livermore, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Falls church.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Falls church | Livermore |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 11.9% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 6.5% | 8.8% |
| Depression | 19.9% | 19.6% |
| Smoking | 7.5% | 9.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.8% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 30.8% | 26.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Falls church vs Livermore
- In Livermore, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.9% compared to 11.9% in Falls church.
- Depression is more prevalent in Falls church at 19.9% compared to 19.6% in Livermore.
- Livermore has a higher smoking rate at 9.4% compared to 7.5% in Falls church.
- Binge drinking is more common in Falls church at 18.8% compared to 18.4% in Livermore.
- Obesity rates are higher in Falls church at 30.8% compared to 26.6% in Livermore.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Livermore at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Falls church.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Falls church | Livermore |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (50) | 1.4% (1,173) |
| High School Diploma | 4.1% (597) | 9.5% (8,051) |
| Less than High School | 2.7% (388) | 7.8% (6,576) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 52.5% (7,660) | 35.4% (30,013) |
Education Levels Comparison: Falls church vs Livermore
- In Livermore, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.3% in Falls church.
- In Livermore, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 9.5% compared to 4.1% in Falls church.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Livermore at 7.8%, compared to 2.7% in Falls church.
- A higher percentage of residents in Falls church hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 52.5% compared to 35.4% in Livermore.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.