Demographics details for Evansville, IN vs Laurel, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Evansville, IN vs Laurel, MS.
| Data | Evansville | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 115,749 | 17,066 |
| Median Age | 38.1 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $49,853 | $36,336 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Evansville vs Laurel
- In Evansville, the population is higher at 115,749, compared to 17,066 in Laurel.
- Residents in Evansville have a higher median age of 38.1 years compared to 37.6 years in Laurel.
- Evansville has a higher median income of $49,853 compared to $36,336 in Laurel.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Evansville at 33.0% compared to 29.0% in Laurel.
- The poverty level is higher in Laurel at 20%, compared to 13% in Evansville.
- Laurel has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 4.4% in Evansville.
Demographics
Demographics Evansville vs Laurel provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Evansville | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 14 | 66 |
| White | 76 | 28 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Evansville vs Laurel
- In Laurel, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 66% compared to 14% in Evansville.
- Evansville has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 28% in Laurel.
- The Asian population is larger in Evansville at 1% compared to 0% in Laurel.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Evansville and Laurel at 4%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Evansville at 5% compared to 1% in Laurel.
- In Laurel, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Evansville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Evansville | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 14.9% |
| Depression | 27.6% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 23.2% | 23.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 11.6% |
| Obesity | 44.3% | 44.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Evansville vs Laurel
- More residents in Evansville report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 17.9% in Laurel.
- Depression is more prevalent in Evansville at 27.6% compared to 21.8% in Laurel.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Evansville at 23.2% compared to 23.1% in Laurel.
- Binge drinking is more common in Evansville at 15.9% compared to 11.6% in Laurel.
- Laurel has higher obesity rates at 44.5% compared to 44.3% in Evansville.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Evansville and Laurel at 18.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Evansville | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (939) | 0.7% (124) |
| High School Diploma | 20.0% (23,144) | 17.3% (2,956) |
| Less than High School | 13.6% (15,701) | 17.5% (2,979) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.7% (18,125) | 14.6% (2,485) |
Education Levels Comparison: Evansville vs Laurel
- A higher percentage of residents in Evansville have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.7% in Laurel.
- A higher percentage of residents in Evansville hold a high school diploma at 20.0% compared to 17.3% in Laurel.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Laurel at 17.5%, compared to 13.6% in Evansville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Evansville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.7% compared to 14.6% in Laurel.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.