Demographics details for Eureka, MO vs Cranberry township, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Eureka, MO vs Cranberry township, PA.

Data Eureka Cranberry township
Population 12,729 31,560
Median Age 37.9 years 41.0 years
Median Income $104,697 $100,000
Married Families 42.0% 72.0%
Poverty Level 5% 4%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.2

Population Comparison: Eureka vs Cranberry township

  • The population in Cranberry township is higher at 31,560, compared to 12,729 in Eureka.
  • The median age in Cranberry township is higher at 41.0 years, compared to 37.9 years in Eureka.
  • Eureka has a higher median income of $104,697 compared to $100,000 in Cranberry township.
  • In Cranberry township, the percentage of married families is higher at 72.0%, compared to 42.0% in Eureka.
  • Eureka has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 4% in Cranberry township.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Eureka and Cranberry township at 3.2%.

Demographics

Demographics Eureka vs Cranberry township provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Eureka Cranberry township
Black Data is updating 3
White 88 90
Asian 2 4
Hispanic 2 2
Two or More Races 8 1
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Eureka vs Cranberry township

  • In Cranberry township, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Eureka.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Cranberry township at 90% compared to 88% in Eureka.
  • In Cranberry township, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Eureka.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Eureka and Cranberry township at 2%.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Eureka at 8% compared to 1% in Cranberry township.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Eureka and Cranberry township at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Eureka Cranberry township
Mental Health Not Good 14.2% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 8.7% Data is updating%
Depression 22.8% Data is updating%
Smoking 14.1% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 21.9% Data is updating%
Obesity 30.0% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 7.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Eureka vs Cranberry township

  • More residents in Eureka report poor mental health at 14.2% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Eureka at 22.8% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Eureka at 14.1% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Eureka at 21.9% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Eureka at 30.0% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Eureka at 7.0% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Eureka Cranberry township
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 10.5% (1,337) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 3.2% (405) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 30.1% (3,835) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Eureka vs Cranberry township

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Eureka and Cranberry township at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Eureka hold a high school diploma at 10.5% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.
  • More residents in Eureka have less than a high school education at 3.2% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Eureka hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.1% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.