Environment details: Eureka MO
water quality is below average, some contaminants found.
Environment details: Cranberry township PA
Satisfactory; adequate management.
Compare Environment: Eureka MO vs Cranberry township PA
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Eureka | Cranberry township |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 936 | 1708 |
| Water Quality | 4/10 | 6/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | water quality is below average, some contaminants found. | Satisfactory; adequate management. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.69 | 1.68 |
| Worst AQI | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 32 | 35 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Eureka vs Cranberry township
- The water quality in Cranberry township is superior at 6/10 compared to 4/10 in Eureka.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- The average air quality index is worse in Eureka with 1.69 compared to 1.68 in Cranberry township.
- Cranberry township experiences more days with poor air quality at 35 compared to 32 in Eureka.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.