Demographics details for Essex junction, VT vs Jackson, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Essex junction, VT vs Jackson, MO.
| Data | Essex junction | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,917 | 15,702 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $92,589 | $72,500 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Essex junction vs Jackson
- The population in Jackson is higher at 15,702, compared to 10,917 in Essex junction.
- Residents in Essex junction have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 35.0 years in Jackson.
- Essex junction has a higher median income of $92,589 compared to $72,500 in Jackson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Essex junction at 46.0% compared to 44.0% in Jackson.
- The poverty level is higher in Jackson at 8%, compared to 6% in Essex junction.
- Jackson has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.5% in Essex junction.
Demographics
Demographics Essex junction vs Jackson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Essex junction | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 2 |
| White | 79 | 89 |
| Asian | 8 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Essex junction vs Jackson
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Essex junction at 3% compared to 2% in Jackson.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Jackson at 89% compared to 79% in Essex junction.
- The Asian population is larger in Essex junction at 8% compared to 1% in Jackson.
- Jackson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 2% in Essex junction.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Essex junction at 8% compared to 5% in Jackson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Essex junction and Jackson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Essex junction | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.1% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 27.1% | 25.5% |
| Smoking | 11.8% | 17.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.9% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 26.4% | 36.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Essex junction vs Jackson
- In Jackson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.1% in Essex junction.
- Depression is more prevalent in Essex junction at 27.1% compared to 25.5% in Jackson.
- Jackson has a higher smoking rate at 17.9% compared to 11.8% in Essex junction.
- Binge drinking is more common in Essex junction at 20.9% compared to 19.1% in Jackson.
- Jackson has higher obesity rates at 36.2% compared to 26.4% in Essex junction.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Jackson at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Essex junction.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Essex junction | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (162) | 0.5% (72) |
| High School Diploma | 8.2% (899) | 15.4% (2,423) |
| Less than High School | 8.8% (966) | 7.8% (1,231) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 34.3% (3,742) | 23.8% (3,742) |
Education Levels Comparison: Essex junction vs Jackson
- A higher percentage of residents in Essex junction have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.5% in Jackson.
- In Jackson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.4% compared to 8.2% in Essex junction.
- More residents in Essex junction have less than a high school education at 8.8% compared to 7.8% in Jackson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Essex junction hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.3% compared to 23.8% in Jackson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.