Environment details: Essex junction VT
good quality, few issues detected.
Environment details: Jackson MO
Poor quality; unfit for drinking.
Compare Environment: Essex junction VT vs Jackson MO
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Essex junction | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 45 | 936 |
| Water Quality | 7/10 | 3/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | good quality, few issues detected. | Poor quality; unfit for drinking. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.64 | 1.68 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 18 | 34 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Essex junction vs Jackson
- Water quality is rated higher in Essex junction at 7/10 compared to 3/10 in Jackson.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Jackson with an average index of 1.68 compared to 1.64 in Essex junction.
- Jackson experiences more days with poor air quality at 34 compared to 18 in Essex junction.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.