Demographics details for Erskine, MN vs Sweetwater, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Erskine, MN vs Sweetwater, TX.
| Data | Erskine | Sweetwater |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 393 | 10,408 |
| Median Age | 39.5 years | 35.7 years |
| Median Income | $26,000 | $44,306 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Erskine vs Sweetwater
- The population in Sweetwater is higher at 10,408, compared to 393 in Erskine.
- Residents in Erskine have a higher median age of 39.5 years compared to 35.7 years in Sweetwater.
- Sweetwater has a higher median income of $44,306, compared to $26,000 in Erskine.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Erskine at 37.0% compared to 32.0% in Sweetwater.
- The poverty level is higher in Sweetwater at 15%, compared to 0% in Erskine.
- Sweetwater has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 4.2% in Erskine.
Demographics
Demographics Erskine vs Sweetwater provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Erskine | Sweetwater |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 6 |
| White | 80 | 34 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 10 | 46 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Erskine vs Sweetwater
- In Sweetwater, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Erskine.
- Erskine has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 34% in Sweetwater.
- The Asian population is larger in Erskine at 3% compared to 0% in Sweetwater.
- Sweetwater has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 46%, compared to 10% in Erskine.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sweetwater at 13%, compared to 7% in Erskine.
- In Sweetwater, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Erskine.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Erskine | Sweetwater |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 14.3% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 24.2% |
| Smoking | 19.9% | 20.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.9% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 39.8% | 38.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Erskine vs Sweetwater
- In Sweetwater, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 15.6% in Erskine.
- Depression is more prevalent in Erskine at 24.3% compared to 24.2% in Sweetwater.
- Sweetwater has a higher smoking rate at 20.3% compared to 19.9% in Erskine.
- Binge drinking is more common in Erskine at 21.9% compared to 17.3% in Sweetwater.
- Obesity rates are higher in Erskine at 39.8% compared to 38.9% in Sweetwater.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sweetwater at 21.0% compared to 20.0% in Erskine.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Erskine | Sweetwater |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (5) | 1.9% (194) |
| High School Diploma | 33.8% (133) | 16.0% (1,666) |
| Less than High School | 18.3% (72) | 23.1% (2,408) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 4.3% (17) | 7.0% (733) |
Education Levels Comparison: Erskine vs Sweetwater
- In Sweetwater, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 1.3% in Erskine.
- A higher percentage of residents in Erskine hold a high school diploma at 33.8% compared to 16.0% in Sweetwater.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sweetwater at 23.1%, compared to 18.3% in Erskine.
- In Sweetwater, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.0% compared to 4.3% in Erskine.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.