Environment details: Erskine MN
Fairly good quality; local oversight noted.
Environment details: Sweetwater TX
Poor quality, significant pollutants from runoff.
Compare Environment: Erskine MN vs Sweetwater TX
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Erskine | Sweetwater |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 665 | 5308 |
| Water Quality | 6/10 | 3/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Fairly good quality; local oversight noted. | Poor quality, significant pollutants from runoff. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.56 | 1.75 |
| Worst AQI | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 8 | 23 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Erskine vs Sweetwater
- Water quality is rated higher in Erskine at 6/10 compared to 3/10 in Sweetwater.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Sweetwater with an average index of 1.75 compared to 1.56 in Erskine.
- Sweetwater experiences more days with poor air quality at 23 compared to 8 in Erskine.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.