Demographics details for Ephrata, WA vs Fort smith, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ephrata, WA vs Fort smith, AR.
| Data | Ephrata | Fort smith |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,476 | 89,992 |
| Median Age | 33.4 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $57,958 | $50,799 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Ephrata vs Fort smith
- The population in Fort smith is higher at 89,992, compared to 8,476 in Ephrata.
- The median age in Fort smith is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 33.4 years in Ephrata.
- Ephrata has a higher median income of $57,958 compared to $50,799 in Fort smith.
- In Fort smith, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 33.0% in Ephrata.
- The poverty level is higher in Fort smith at 12%, compared to 11% in Ephrata.
- The unemployment rate in Ephrata is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.7% in Fort smith.
Demographics
Demographics Ephrata vs Fort smith provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ephrata | Fort smith |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 8 |
| White | 63 | 57 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 6 |
| Hispanic | 25 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Ephrata vs Fort smith
- In Fort smith, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 1% in Ephrata.
- Ephrata has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 57% in Fort smith.
- In Fort smith, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Ephrata.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ephrata at 25% compared to 19% in Fort smith.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ephrata at 11% compared to 9% in Fort smith.
- In Fort smith, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Ephrata.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ephrata | Fort smith |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 19.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 27.0% | 27.8% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 21.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 13.2% |
| Obesity | 35.1% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ephrata vs Fort smith
- In Fort smith, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 18.0% in Ephrata.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort smith at 27.8% versus 27.0% in Ephrata.
- Fort smith has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 17.0% in Ephrata.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ephrata at 17.6% compared to 13.2% in Fort smith.
- Fort smith has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 35.1% in Ephrata.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort smith at 20.0% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ephrata | Fort smith |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (65) | 2.3% (2,029) |
| High School Diploma | 17.7% (1,503) | 14.8% (13,356) |
| Less than High School | 14.4% (1,223) | 19.8% (17,822) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (677) | 16.4% (14,745) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ephrata vs Fort smith
- In Fort smith, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.8% in Ephrata.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ephrata hold a high school diploma at 17.7% compared to 14.8% in Fort smith.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort smith at 19.8%, compared to 14.4% in Ephrata.
- In Fort smith, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.