Environment details: Ephrata WA
Water quality acceptable; few contaminants present.
Environment details: Fort smith AR
Below average, monitoring required for safety.
Compare Environment: Ephrata WA vs Fort smith AR
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Ephrata | Fort smith |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 590 | 496 |
| Water Quality | 6/10 | 4/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Water quality acceptable; few contaminants present. | Below average, monitoring required for safety. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.75 | 1.57 |
| Worst AQI | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 39 | 20 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Ephrata vs Fort smith
- Water quality is rated higher in Ephrata at 6/10 compared to 4/10 in Fort smith.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- The average air quality index is worse in Ephrata with 1.75 compared to 1.57 in Fort smith.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Ephrata at 39 compared to 20 in Fort smith.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.